State Rep. Kasey Carpenter, R-Dalton, presented the latest version of his legislation granting in–state college tuition for illegal aliens in the House Higher Education Committee last Friday. He was on Zoom from his car parked “on the side of the road” somewhere between the Gold Dome and Oklahoma. He was retrieving flour for one of his restaurants.
It got wackier from there.
Carpenter’s opener was to assure that his legislation rewarding illegal aliens with lower tuition rates than paid by Americans or legal immigrants from most other states “is not a bill about immigration.” He went on to outline HB 120: “All right, so what this bill does, is it, it, it basically allows DACA students that are in Georgia, they graduated from a Georgia high school, to attend certain colleges and universities in the, in the college system, at an in-state tuition rate.”
‘DACA’ is the acronym for the 2012 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy put in place by then candidate for re–election, President Barack Obama. The action being deferred is deportation proceedings.
It was more than a little amusing to watch Carpenter pepper his online sales pitch with the terms “DACA” and “DACA recipients” as well as in the resulting Q&A with gushing Democrat committee members who had only praise for the concept. It was equally entertaining to see the long line of witnesses— one who is currently a DACA recipient and one who was standing in support of the bill inserting the “DACA recipient” term into testimony.
But note this: None of the legislators seemed to care that neither “DACA” or “DACA recipient” are anywhere in Carpenter’s tuition amnesty bill.
The entire event would only have been slightly more comical if Carpenter had taken the time to hawk his bill dressed in a wide striped suit with a wink and grin from a used car lot with balloons and a bullhorn.
In the current version of his proposed law, Carpenter does have wording that permits illegal aliens to pay less tuition than Americans if they meet “the eligibility criteria set by the United States Department of Homeland Security for deferred action in enforcement of federal immigration laws.” (Italics mine.)
But, there doesn’t seem to be set eligibility criteria for deferred action on enforcement— it is a discretionary tradition in federal law enforcement and (like DACA) not a result of congressional action. Lines 34 & 35 in HB 120 would be laughed out of a well-informed committee. And responsible ‘journalists’ would not be running stories that report HB 120 somehow applies to “DACA recipients.” It doesn’t.
Deferred action is not DACA. Sometimes it is difficult to decide if things that are just plain screwy are a result of ignorance or intent. Deferred action on immigration enforcement is outside of DACA. (The late John Lennon obtained deferred action on deportation in the 1970s.)
All co-signers are not visible online, but at last check with the House clerk’s office, Carpenter’s in–state tuition bill has more Democrat co–sponsors than Republicans.
As is, HB 120 is a hustle fully dependent on the oversupply of immigration ignorance on the part of most of the legislators who govern a state with more “undocumented workers” than live in Arizona.
We were happy to post a very critical analysis of the debut of HB 120 along with facts the media is suppressing— and fully expected to see changes in the bill as a result.
None of the above is intended to indicate certainty that the bill won’t be passed out of the House Higher Education Committee and onto the floor. I got a sense of the determination to advance the bill in an early morning discussion with the committee Chairman Chuck Martin, R-Alpharetta, when my request for a copy of any committee substitute language was first dodged then tacitly refused.
As I write on Sunday, the current version is still not online, but should be here. And a fiscal note for HB 120 is available here.
We have posted a link to the official video of the entire Friday hearing and a transcript of Carpenter’s presentation on the Dustin Inman Society website.
Space does not allow a list of all the problems with HB 120. But it should be mentioned that “‘DACA recipients”’ are nevertheless illegal aliens according to the United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit. Even the liberal AJC reported that.
D.A. King is president of the Dustin Inman Society
